Checks and Balances?
The framers of the U.S. Constitution created an elegant system of checks and balances in order to limit the power of the federal government. Key to their design was the division of Congress into two houses: a lower house, elected directly by the people, and an upper house, with its members selected by the state legislatures. But in 1913, the 17th Amendment turned this system on its heads by providing for the direct election of senators and disenfranchising the sovereign states. Today, with Congress’s approval at record lows and a central government that grows larger by the day, perhaps it is time to ask if this experiment has run its course. Perhaps it is time to consider repealing the 17th Amendment.
Join ALEC, the Equal Justice Coalition, and the Claremont Institute for a tele-town hall on the history and future of the 17th Amendment. Dr. John Eastman, Founding Director of Claremont’s Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, will be joined by the Equal Justice Coalition’s Jay Feinberg and Trent England of the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs to present the arguments for and against the direct election of senators. The discussion promises to be a fascinating investigation of an issue that urgently deserves to be revived as part of our national debate.
Tuesday, September, 13, 2016, 1:00 p.m. EDT