Home »  Writings »

What Really Matters in This Presidential Campaign

By Brian P. Janiskee

Posted September 20, 2004


Print This

Political life as we know it is over in America. We have entered a new age since 9/11. This may seem obvious to the casual observer, but old habits die hard for a generation of analysts who were trained to view political combat as a clever joust over economic conditions, hot-button social issues, and traditional foreign policy questions. This is not to say that these issues are irrelevant. That would be silly. These issues are important but they no longer drive national politics.

We analysts continue to lapse back into our foggy ruminations of days gone by despite the wreckage of the World Trade Center, the damaged Pentagon, the Madrid bombings, the bloody suicide attacks, the brutal videotaped murders, and countless other savage acts. Such atrocities haunt us for a while and then get tucked away into a sequestered corner of our minds so that we can get back to discussing "politics."

Over the past few weeks, we analysts chimed in on the effect that the swift boat vets were having on Senator Kerry's poll numbers. We evaluated the McCain, Giuliani, and Schwarzenegger convention appearances and to what extent they would help the President with "swing" voters. We dissected the speeches of Vice President Cheney and Democratic Senator Zell Miller and fell all over ourselves, deciding whether or not they were too "negative." We patted ourselves on the back for our clever analysis of President Bush's acceptance speech—"part Clinton" (on the domestic side) and "part Reagan" (on the foreign policy side). And, we calculated the damage to the so-called mainstream media by the pseudo-Machiavellian tomfoolery of the CBS Bush-memo fiasco.

But at the end of these past few weeks, after all of the confetti had fallen to the convention floor, the balloons had been dropped and popped, and the press corps had been feverishly driven into the minutiae of type fonts and forgery analysis, our fanciful political musings have been continuously interrupted by the nightmare of Beslan.

The savage terrorist attack in Russia was the defining event of the past fortnight and would have been so no matter what happened at the Republican Convention, short of a complete meltdown by the president in his speech. Hundreds of children—ranging from infants to teenagers—along with their parents and teachers, were tortured, bayoneted, and shot in the back by terrorists in a little school in a small Russian town. Granted, these atrocities did not happen in America, but no one seriously views these events as separated from the more general War on Terror.

Don't be fooled. The swift boat controversy, the antics of Michael Moore, the machinations of George Soros, the recent trends in economic data, the debates over health care, and the manufactured controversy over George Bush's service in the National Guard are all a sideshow. The fundamental structure of this race would have been the same with or without these things.

When the books are written, the lasting image of our current political era will not be that of a particular political advertisement, a controversial documentary film, or the peaks and valleys of some economic trend line. The look that dominates our age and spurs us to victory is that of the keening survivor, beholding the mutilated victim. The Pieta—not the prancing pinstriped political operative—is the defining image of our time.

The truth is that most Americans understand this, despite the daily ramblings of the talking heads. That's why most Americans have come to realize that George Bush—warts and all—is better suited than John Kerry—warts and all—to be president. Most Americans think that victory is more likely with Bush at the helm. That is why the poll numbers are moving in his direction. And that is why, barring some campaign cataclysm, he will be elected to a second term by a margin bigger than most analysts expect. The reason for this is that most people in America still recognize the difference between a daydream and reality. Most Americans still recognize that our survival depends upon the struggle to remember what we always seem to forget.

About the Authors

Brian Janiskee

Brian P. Janiskee is an Associate Professor of Political Science at California State University, San Bernardino. Dr. Janiskee holds a Ph.D. from Michigan State University with fields in American Politics, Public Administration and Policy, and Statistics.

Dr. Janiskee's research interests include state and local government, public policy, presidential elections, and public administration. Along with co-author Ken Masugi, Director of the Claremont Institute's Center for Local Government, Dr. Janiskee has authored an innovative California government text called Democracy in California: Politics and Government in the Golden State (Rowman & Littlefield, 2003). This text uses many ideas raised by Tocqueville to analyze the current workings of California politics.

In addition, Janiskee and Masugi have coedited a collection of timely essays on California politics titled The California Republic: Institutions, Statesmanship, and Policies (Rowman & Littlefield, 2004).

Dr. Janiskee's articles on California's three strikes law, co-authored with Claremont Institute Senior Fellow and colleague at Cal. State, Edward J. Erler, has received national attention. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor relied on Janiskee and Erler's research in her recent majority opinion in Ewing v. California, which upheld California's three strikes law.

Other articles on topics ranging from local government to presidential elections have appeared in such journals as: Perspectives on Political Science; The Journal of Public Service and Outreach; Nexus: A Journal of Opinion; Talking Politics: The Journal of the Politics Association.

Dr. Janiskee's analysis of contemporary trends in local, state, and national politics has appeared in such outlets as the Washington Post, Orange County Register, San Diego-Union-Tribune, Investor's Business Daily, Boston Globe, Baltimore Sun, and USA Today.

As of September 2002, Dr. Janiskee began a four-year term on the National Executive Council of Pi Sigma Alpha, the political science honor society, which has over 600 chapters nationwide. The 19-member Executive Council is the governing body of Pi Sigma Alpha. Dr. Janiskee's service on the Executive Council was preceded by his award-winning work as a Chapter Advisor at the local level. In recognition for the excellence of its programs, the Theta Iota Chapter at Cal. State, San Bernardino received the National Best Chapter Award for two consecutive academic years, 1999-2000 and 2000-2001. In addition, Dr. Janiskee received the National Best Chapter Advisor Award in 2002.

Go to:

Search the Site

 

E-mail Newsletter

Enter your email address below to join Precepts, the Claremont Institute's email newsletter.

 

My Claremont Login

Stay up to date with the Claremont Institute events, programs, and publications most important to you. Claremont Review of Books subscribers receive complete online access from the first day an issue is published. Please login below or click here to sign-up.

E-mail
Password

Copyright © 2002-2008 The Claremont Institute. Technical problems may be brought to the attention of the webmaster.