Go to MissileThreat.com
Recent Items
-
Karako on 25th Anniversary of SDI
This week marks the 25th anniversary of Ronald Reagan's speech announcing the Strategic Defense Initiative, a research and development program designed to render obsolete ballistic missiles on which nuclear weapons can be carried. The Bush administration has taken important first steps toward national missile defense, and current programs deserve much praise, but they also fall short of the strategic defense envisioned by Reagan, writes Tom Karako in Investor's Business Daily. -
Survey of Adjutant Generals Shows States Unprepared for EMP Attack
-
Karako in Missile Defense Symposium
Tom Karako, director of programs for the Claremont Institute and editor of Missilethreat.com, participated in a symposium discussing ballistic missile defense policy. Sponsored by Front Page magazine, the symposium included Jed Babbin, Ilan Berman, and Austin Bay. -
Independent Working Group Issues Missile Defense Report
-
Karako in Defense News: Behind Russia's Fuss
-
Deploying A Missile Defense
With President Bush's announcement on Tuesday that the U.S. will deploy a ground-based missile defense in 2004, the future looks promising, writes Tom Karako. -
A Funny Morality
The self-righteous friends of North Korea turn their attention away, not only from human rights violations, but human nature itself, writes fellow in California Studies Victor Davis Hanson. -
The ABM Treaty Is Gone, What Now?
Claremont Institute President Brian Kennedy explains what must be done if missile defense is to become a reality for post-ABM Treaty national defense. -
Getting Serious About Nukes
Institute fellow Mark T. Clark comments on the media reaction to the Defense Department's new thinking on nuclear weapons and the war on terrorism. -
Protecting Our Nation:The Urgent Need for Ballistic Missile Defense
In this speech, which appeared in the 2002 edition of Vital Speeches of the Day, Brian Kennedy spoke on changes in the urgent need for a ballistic missle defense system since September 11th. -
America is Worth Defending
A good national missile defense system is necessary, and it is currently within our capabilities — so why do the arguments against it remain? Thomas Krannawitter and Brian Kennedy write on the series of arguments given against building a national missile defense system. -
The Way to Missile Defense
President Bush says the 1972 ABM Treaty has outlived its usefulness. The question now is whether the administration will officially withdraw from the treaty. That's the next great step toward a national missile defense, writes senior fellow Angelo Codevilla. -
Missile Defense: The Hard Way
The Clinton Administration intends to build a national defense that puts the ideology of the ABM Treaty ahead of saving the lives of Americans, wrties senior fellow Angelo Codevilla. -
The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, Junk Arms Control
By rejecting the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the Senate was defending common sense, writes adjunct fellow Mackubin Thomas Owens. -
The Clinton Administration's Forked-Tongued Defense Initiative
President Clinton has agreed reluctantly not to veto the National Defense Act of 1999, but the White House is working behind the scenes to block missile defense for at least a decade. -
Boxer, Fong, and the Defender Gap
Recently, a controversy has emerged between Matt Fong and Barbara Boxer which goes to one of the nation's and the Senate's chief concerns — national security. -
Our Founding Principles and Ballistic Missile Defense
Claremont Institute Fellow John Grant reminds us why our founding principles require us to defend against ballistic missile attack. -
Kennedy Participates in Missile Defense Roundtable
Brian T. Kennedy, president of the Claremont Institute, participated in a roundtable discussion on U.S. missile defense policy on Tuesday, July 25, in Washington, D.C. The roundtable discussion was organized by the Center for Security Policy, and featured leading U.S. congressmen, government officials, and missile defense experts. -
China, Russia and the New Geopolitics of Power
Prudence dictates that the United States should act to deter Chinese adventurism. To do so, we must counter the China-Russia strategic relationship, writes Mackubin Thomas Owens. -
Executive Summary of the Report of the Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States
