The Michigan "Diversity" Case

Posted June 23, 2003

Print This

Former Attorney General Edwin Meese III, together with Dr. John C. Eastman, Director of The Claremont Institute's Center for Constitution Jurisprudence filed an amicus curiae brief on January 16 urging the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down Michigan's race-based admissions programs as contrary to the fundamental equality principle articulated originally in the Declaration of Independence and subsequently codified in the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. 

Rejecting Michigan's claim that it had a compelling interest in "diversity," Eastman and Meese note that such a claim would not only put us on the path toward perpetual race-balancing, but would actually permit, perhaps even require, the government to ban historically black colleges.

Go to:




Download Adobe Acrobat for PDF Files

Download Adobe Acrobat for PDF Files

Articles About this Case:


Search the Site

 

E-mail Newsletter

Enter your email address below to stay informed about Claremont Institute events and scholarship.

 

My Claremont Login


Stay up to date with the Claremont Institute events, programs, and publications most important to you. Claremont Review of Books subscribers receive complete online access from the first day an issue is published. Please login below or click here to sign-up.

E-mail
Password

Other Sites

Right-Reason.org
Right Reason, written by Hadley Arkes, is a journal dedicated to the application of natural law reasoning to past and current court cases.

Missilethreat.com
Ballistic Missile Defense: Understanding the Nuclear Threat

Founding.com
A User's Guide to the Declaration of Independence

Vindicating The Founders.com
Race, Sex, Class and Justice in the Origins of America

Copyright © 2002-2013 The Claremont Institute. Technical problems may be brought to the attention of the webmaster.  

 Terms & Conditions    Privacy Statement