Home »  Writings »

Karako on California's Two-Thirds Budget Vote

Instituted in 1933, California's required two-thirds vote for budgets was seen as a structural measure to limit spending and compel a kind of bipartisanship. The supermajority requirement represents a distrust of power. But the political science of The Federalist Papers teaches us that the concentration of power without accountability can be even worse, writes Tom Karako of the Claremont Institute in the Orange County Register here.

Search the Site

 

E-mail Newsletter

Enter your email address below to stay informed about Claremont Institute events and scholarship.

 

My Claremont Login


Stay up to date with the Claremont Institute events, programs, and publications most important to you. Claremont Review of Books subscribers receive complete online access from the first day an issue is published. Please login below or click here to sign-up.

E-mail
Password

Copyright © 2002-2013 The Claremont Institute. Technical problems may be brought to the attention of the webmaster.  

 Terms & Conditions    Privacy Statement